Thawney v. City Of New York , et al
Reginald Thawney |
City of New York, Joseph Ponte, John Doe and John and Jane Doe |
1:2017cv01881 |
March 15, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Paul A. Engelmayer |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 OPINION & ORDER re: 45 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Nacirema Summers, Joseph Ponte, Bianery Garcia, City of New York, 51 MOTION t o Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Nacirema Summers, Joseph Ponte, Bianery Garcia, City of New York. For the reasons stated above, the Court denies defend ants' motion to dismiss Thawney's first, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action; and grants defendants' motion to dismiss claim three, which alleges municipal liability under Monell. The Clerk of Court is respectfully dire cted to remove Commissioner Ponte from the caption of this case and to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 45 and 51. Within one week of this decision, the parties are directed to submit a revised case management plan to govern discovery, consistent with the Court's individual rules. SO ORDERED. (Joseph Ponte (Department of Correction Commissioner) terminated.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 10/11/2018) (anc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.