Bushell v. Unitedhealth Group Inc. et al
Jamie Bushell |
Unitedhealth Group Inc., Oxford Health Plans, Inc., Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc. |
1:2017cv02021 |
March 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
J. Paul Oetken |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Unitedhealth Group Inc., Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc., Oxford Health Plans, Inc., Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the motion dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, with the following results: Counts One, Six, and Seven survive. Count Three is dismissed with prejudice. Counts Two, Four, and Five are dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Oxford Health Plans, Inc. and Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc. are di smissed without prejudice. Defendant UnitedHealth Group, Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. The motion to add United HealthCare Insurance Co. as a defendant is denied. The remaining defendant shall file an answer within 14 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 20. SO ORDERED.., Unitedhealth Group Inc., Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc. and Oxford Health Plans, Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/27/2018) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.