Hollander Glass Texas, Inc. v. Rosen-Paramount Glass Co., Inc. et al
| Hollander Glass Texas, Inc. |
| Rosen-Paramount Glass Co., Inc. and Stanley Rosen |
| 1:2017cv02105 |
| March 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation for 70 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, I adopt the Report in its entirety. Plaintiff shall receive statutory damages in the amount of $25,000, attorneys' fees in the amount of $21 ,904, and costs in the amount of $1,269.31. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 2/1/2019) (anc) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
70
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff Hollander Glass Texas, Inc., should be awarded a judgment of $48,173.31 against Rosen Paramount Glass & Mirror, LLC and David Gutman, consisting of $25,000 in statutory damages and $23,173.31 in attorneys' fees and costs. Objections to R&R due by 3/27/2018 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 3/12/2018) Copies Sent By Chambers. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
