Huizenga v. NYP Holdings, Inc. d/b/a the New York Post et al
| Robert Huizenga |
| NYP Holdings, Inc., Joelle Gwynn and Does 1-20 |
| 1:2017cv02113 |
| March 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This action having previously been terminated as to defendant NYP Holdings, Inc., and the attorneys for the parties having advised the Court that this action has been or will be settled as against the remaining served defendant, J oelle Gwynn, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, but without prejudice to restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned if settlement is not achieved within thirty (30) d ays of the date of this Order. If a party wishes to reopen this matter or extend the time within which it may be settled, the party must make a letter application before this thirty (30)-day period expires. The parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they shall submit the settlement agreement to the Court to be so ordered. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/11/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 49 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Joelle Gwynn. For the foregoing reasons, Gwynn's motion to dismiss is granted, and the SAC is dismissed with respect to Gwynn. This dismissal is withou t prejudice to an application for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint. Any such motion must be filed by May 7, 2019, and be accompanied by a proposed Third Amended Complaint, a blackline comparison of the proposed Third Amended Complaint and the SAC, and a memorandum of law. If Plaintiff does not timely move for leave to amend, or if the motion is denied as futile, the SAC will be dismissed with prejudice as to Gwynn. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 49. SO ORDERED., ( Motions due by 5/7/2019.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/16/2019) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
