Amhaz v. Booking.com (USA) Inc. et al
| Nancy Amhaz |
| Booking.com (USA) Inc., The Priceline Group Inc. and John Doe's #1-10 |
| 1:2017cv02120 |
| March 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| George B. Daniels |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting 111 Report and Recommendations: For the reasons stated herein, this Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Wang's Report and approves the proposed settlement agreement. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 6/29/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER adopting 74 Report and Recommendations, 36 Motion to Certify Class filed by Nancy Amhaz. Having reviewed the Report for clear error and finding none, this Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety. This Court conditionally certifies a collective action of account managers and key account managers in Defendant's New York and Las Vegas offices and key account managers in Defendant's Los Angeles office. Plaintiff's motion is denied i n all other respects. To the extent they have not already done so, the parties are directed to meet and confer and submit to Magistrate Judge Pitman a joint collective notice proposal for his review. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 9/5/2018) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
