Fisher v. SD Protection Inc. et al
| Michael Fisher |
| SD Protection Inc. and Sandra Dominguez Mercado |
| 1:2017cv02229 |
| March 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Richard M. Berman |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER: In light of the Court's June 4, 2020 order approving the settlement agreement in this case, as well as Plaintiff's counsel's February 3, 2022 letter stating that the settlement has been "fully paid," the Clerk is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 6/16/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing
116
DECISION & ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT: The Court hereby approves the agreed upon settlement in the amount of $25,000 between Plaintiff and Defendants. The allocation is: $4,733.60 to Plaintiff's counsel to cover its costs ; $9,096.40 to Plaintiff's counsel as attorneys' fees; and $11,170 to Plaintiff. From these amounts should be subtracted the $4,000 already paid by Defendants pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. Defense counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel, dated April 14, 2020, is denied without prejudice in order to facilitate Defendants' payment of the balance owed to Plaintiff under the Settlement Agreement. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 6/4/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
107
DECISION & ORDER denying as moot 88 Motion for Judgment. Plaintiff and Defendant shall submit any comments they may have in writing and suggest a timetable for next steps in this case on or before April 15, 2020 (noon). Plaintiff's counsel� 39;s application, dated March 4, 2020, which requests that the Court "grant Plaintiff's [May 23, 2019] Motion to Enforce the Settlement" and "enter judgment in the amount of $21,000 (representing the outstanding settlement ba lance), plus $1,650 representing time spent by Plaintiff's counsel in connection with enforcement of the settlement, so Plaintiff may begin collection procedures," is denied as moot as there is currently no approved settlement. The Court is fully prepared to conduct a trial on the merits of the case in the event that a settlement cannot be reached by the parties. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 4/7/2020) (clt)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER: The teleconference currently scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. is hereby rescheduled to Tuesday, March 17, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. ( Telephone Conference set for 3/17/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Richard M. Berman.) (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 3/10/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER: The Court has decided to permit counsel for both parties to appear at the March 11, 2020 hearing by telephone. Chambers will contact counsel with dial-in instructions. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 3/5/2020) (cf)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER: The Court has received the mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated February 25, 2020, vacating the Court's order of July 27, 2018 and remanding the case to the Court to "evaluate the r easonableness of the requested attorneys' fees and costs without using proportionality as an outcome determinative factor." Each party shall submit a letter by Thursday, March 5, 2020 at noon with suggestions as to how to proceed. A hearing will be held on Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the next steps. ( Status Conference set for 3/11/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Richard M. Berman.) (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 3/3/2020) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
