Fernandez et al v. City Of New York et al
| Gertrudys Fernandez |
| City Of New York, Jay Cowan, Homer Venters, Shamieka Barreto, Gilbert Southerland, Corizon Health Inc., Correctional Medical Associates of New York, P.C., Corizon Health Clinical Solutions, LLC, Corizon, Inc., Does 1-4 and Medical Does 1-4 |
| 1:2017cv02431 |
| April 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's October 1, 2020 Order, the parties were directed to file a joint status report every ninety days. See ECF No. 210. The parties' most recent status report was due on or before September 28, 2022. As no letter has been filed, the parties are directed to file the status report no later than October 11, 2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/3/2022) (ras)
|
|
Filing
218
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's October 1, 2020 Order, the parties were directed to file a joint status report every ninety days. See ECF No. 210. The parties' most recent status report was due on or before January 7, 2022. As no letter has been filed, the parties are directed to file the status report no later than January 21, 2022. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/13/2022) (ras) (Main Document 218 replaced on 1/13/2022) (ras).
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's October 1, 2020 Order, the parties were directed to file a joint status report every ninety days. See ECF No. 210. The parties' most recent status report was due on or before October 9, 2021. As no letter has been filed, the parties are directed to file the status report no later than October 20, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/13/2021) (ks)
|
|
Filing
213
ORDER: Pursuant to the Court's October 1, 2020 Order, the parties were directed to file a joint status report every ninety days. See ECF No. 210. The parties' most recent status report was due on April 13, 2021. As no letter has been filed, the parties are directed to file the status report no later than April 19, 2021. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 4/16/2021) (ras)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER: The parties are directed to file a joint letter on October 15, 2020, and every ninety days thereafter, updating the Court on the status of proceedings in the Surrogate's Court. So Ordered (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/1/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER: The parties are directed to file a joint letter by July 1, 2020, updating the Court on the status of proceedings in the Surrogate's Court. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 6/15/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
206
ORDER: The parties are directed to file a joint letter by April 1, 2020, updating the Court on the status of proceedings in the Surrogate's Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 3/23/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion to stay the proceedings pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976), is DENIED. The temporary stay on discovery imposed on June 14, 2017, ECF No. 50, is VACAT ED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate Dkt. No. 31. Motions terminated: 31 MOTION to Stay pursuant to Colorado River abstention, filed by City Of New York. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 7/7/2017) (ap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
