Ruffin v. Travers-Marsh et al
Lee A. Ruffin |
Donna Travers-Marsh, "Jane Doe" Furman, Tammi Chaboty and Lynn Lilley |
1:2017cv02564 |
April 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Unassigned |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice. The clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the action, mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff, and file proof of service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/2/2019) (rj) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by "Jane Doe" Furman, Tammi Chaboty, Donna Travers-Marsh, Lynn Lilley. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in p art. Plaintiff's First Amendment free exercise claim, Fourteenth Amendment due process claim, and Eighth Amendment cruel and unusual punishment claims are dismissed, without prejudice, and Plaintiff is granted leave to replead the claims in conf ormity with this opinion. Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims brought against them in their official capacity is granted. Defendants' motion to dismiss on the basis of qualified immunity is denied. A blank Amended Complaint form is at tached. The clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 17, mail a copy of this Opinion to Plaintiff, and file proof of service on the docket. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint in conformance with the above on or before August 9, 2018. Failure to timely file an Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of the Fourteenth Amendment due process claim stemming from the punishment imposed at the disciplinary hearing and the First and Eighth Amend ment claims stemming from the strip frisks and body cavity searches. The Defendants shall answer or seek a pre-motion conference on any potential motion to dismiss by August 30, 2018. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 7/10/2018) (ne) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.