Sae Han Sheet Co., Ltd. v. Eastman Chemical Corp. et al
| Sae Han Sheet Co., Ltd. |
| Eastman Chemical Corp., Commonwealth Laminating and Coating, Inc., John Does and ABC Companies |
| 1:2017cv02734 |
| April 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Commonwealth Laminating and Coating, Inc., Eastman Chemical Corp.: Sae Han Sheet Co., Ltd. ("Plaintiff") brings this action against Eastman Chemical Corp. ("Eastman"), Commonwealth Laminating and Coating, Inc. ("Commonwealth," together, the "Named Defendants"), John Does 1 through 20, and ABC Companies 1 through 20 concerning defective " Suntek" products. Before this Court is the Named Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), or alternatively, to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). For the aforementioned reasons, the Named Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 15, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/18/2017) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
