Martinez v. Quest Xpress LLC et al
| Andres Martinez |
| Quest Xpress LLC and Vincent Yearwood |
| 1:2017cv02850 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement, it is, ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed, without prejudice and costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. The Court will sign a Stipulation and Order of Settlement upon receipt from either party. In the event the parties require more than the 30 days to finalize the settlement, either party shall submit a letter to the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motions, deadlines, conferences, and this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 2/24/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION & ORDER. The Court DENIES Defendants' motion in limine to preclude treating physicians' testimony. The treating physicians are permitted to testify as Rule 701 lay witnesses and may offer opinions formed during the course of treatment. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 10/22/18) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
