Daniel Baten Rojas et al v. Pizza Pete's LLC et al
Plaintiff: Alberto Daniel Baten Rojas
Defendant: Pizza Pete's LLC, Perieso Dilloto, Jay Shim and Timmy Doe
Case Number: 1:2017cv02929
Filed: April 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Paul G. Gardephe
Presiding Judge: Henry B. Pitman
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the settlement agreement in this matter, as modified by plaintiff's letter dated September 13, 2019(Docket Item 61), is approved. This matter is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/18/2019) (js)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 58 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Settlement Agreement and Request for Approval addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman from Joshua S. Androphy dated April 25, 2019. filed by Alberto Daniel Baten Rojas. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, I do not approve the settlement agreement in its current form. I am, however, willing to approve it if counsel's fee is reduced from $33,102.67 to twice counsel's lodestar fi gure, i.e., $22,298.50 and the difference remitted to plaintiff. Counsel are to advise me within ten (10) days whether they agree to this modification of the settlement agreement. So Ordered (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/3/2019) copies transmitted(js)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Baten Rojas et al v. Pizza Pete's LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alberto Daniel Baten Rojas
Represented By: Michael Antonio Faillace
Represented By: Michael Antonio Faillace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pizza Pete's LLC
Represented By: Mitchell S. Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perieso Dilloto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Shim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timmy Doe
Represented By: Mitchell S. Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?