Prabir v. Bukhara Indian Cuisine,Inc et al
| Samuel Prabir |
| Bukhara Indian Cuisine,Inc, Basera Indian Cuisine, Inc., Anil Kumar and Renu Kumar |
| 1:2017cv03704 |
| May 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER re: 64 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment to Dismiss Renu Kumar filed by Basera Indian Cuisine, Inc., Renu Kumar, Bukhara Indian Cuisine,Inc, Anil Kumar. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, I approve the parties' settlement agreement. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed, and the pending motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the claims against Renu Kumar (Docket Item 64) is denied as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/12/2019) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ne)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER for 84 Report and Recommendations, 45 Motion to Attachment filed by Sydur Rashid, Samuel Prabir, Mustafa Jamal Bhuiyan. Having reviewed Judge Pitman's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error therein, and adopts t he Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to issue a pre-judgment order of attachment in the amount of $515,819.00. This resolves Docket Number 45. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/4/2018) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
