Teri Jon Sports, Inc. v. Readmob Technologies (HK) Limited et al
| Teri Jon Sports, Inc. |
| Readmob Technologies (HK) Limited, PayPal Holdings, Inc., Paypal, Inc., American Express Company, Visa Inc., MasterCard Incorporated and Google Inc. |
| 1:2017cv04043 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court's inherent power, see Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-32 (1962), the Court hereby dismisses this case, without prejudice, for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/21/2019) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER. On review of the docket in this matter, it appears that the sole remaining defendant, Readmob Technologies (HK) Ltd. ("Readmob"), was never served, and that plaintiff never filed its Rule 4(f)(3) motion, which was due November 16, 20 17. Dkt. 56. The Court therefore directs plaintiff Teri Jon Sports, Inc. to serve Readmob by November 19, 2019. If service is not completed by then, the Court will dismiss the case, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED. (Service due by 11/19/2019.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/12/2019) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
