Williams v. City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Reggie Williams
Defendant: City Of New York, Laura Clavijo and John Does 1 and 2
Case Number: 1:2017cv04391
Filed: June 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by City Of New York, Laura Clavijo. For the reasons set forth above, the Court grants part and denies in part Defendants' motion to dismiss with respect to all cla ims.1. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 1 (deprivation of federal civil rights) is GRANTED;2. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 2 (illegal search under § 1983) is DENIED;3. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 3 (false arrest under § 1983) is DENIED; 4. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 4 (malicious prosecution § 1983) is DENIED; 5. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 5 (unlawful seizure under § 1983) is DENIED; 6. Defendants' motion to di smiss Claim 6 (failure to intervene § 1983) against Officer Clavijo is GRANTED; 7. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 7 (municipal liability under § 1983) is GRANTED; 8. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 8 (false imprisonment under state law) is GRANTED; 9. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 9 (malicious prosecution under state law) is DENIED; 10. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 10 (unreasonable search and seizure under state law) is GRANTED; 11. Defendant s' motion to dismiss Claim 11 (negligent hiring, training, or retention under state law) is GRANTED; and 12. Defendants' motion to dismiss Claim 12 (respondeat superior under state law) is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear for a s tatus conference on September 13, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 15. It is SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 9/13/2018 at 12:00 PM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/31/2018) (ne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reggie Williams
Represented By: Cyrus Joubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laura Clavijo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1 and 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?