Bernardino v. Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.
| Melina Bernardino |
| Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv04570 |
| June 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Lewis A. Kaplan |
| Katharine H. Parker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2710 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER for 49 Motion to Strike, filed by Melina Bernardino; 78 Report and Recommendations; 39 Motion to Compel Arbitration, Motion to Stay filed by Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. Defendant's motion to compel arbitration [DI 39] is granted. Plaintiffs motion to strike [DI 49] is denied as moot. The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 1/31/2018) (anc) Modified on 1/31/2018 (anc).
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER adopting 47 Report and Recommendations, 20 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Melina Bernardino. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. In a report and recommendatio n dated August 11, 2017 (the "R&R"), Magistrate Judge Katharine Parker recommended that the motion be denied. Plaintiff, while she does not object to the recommendation that the motion be denied, nevertheless objects to the R&R in ord er to quarrel with the magistrate judge's description of two decisions of other district courts and its application of one appellate decision. However, plaintiff's statement that she does not object to the recommendation that the mot ion be denied effectively concedes that her objections are immaterial to the outcome of the motion. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [DI 20] is denied. The objections are overruled without prejudice to plaintiff asserting her position with respect to those cases later in the litigation in the event that determination of her position ever becomes material. In all other respects, the Court adopts the R&R. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 8/28/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
