Cawley v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: John Cawley
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Case Number: 1:2017cv04651
Filed: June 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Kevin Nathaniel Fox
Presiding Judge: Alison J. Nathan
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion, Docket Entry No. 11, is denied, and thedefendant's motion, Docket Entry No. 15, is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 8/2/2018) (rro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cawley v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Cawley
Represented By: Joseph Albert Romano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?