Gomez et al v. Bkuk Corporation et al
Yovani Sanchez Gomez |
Bkuk Corporation, Besim Kukaj, Luan Kukaj and Adrian Lazo |
1:2017cv04652 |
June 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Vernon S. Broderick |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 FIRST LETTER MOTION to Compel entry of judgment due to default addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman from Adam Braverman dated September 27, 2018. filed by Yovani Sanchez Gomez. Accordingly, the Cler k of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment against defendants Bkuk Corporation and Besim Kukaj only in the total amount of $25,646.63, comprised of the unpaid balance of the settlement amount ($15,218.00), the $8,000.00 penalty amount, interest through October 3, 2018 ($363.63) and reasonable attorney's fees ($2,065.00). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark Docket Item 27 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/3/2018) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ne) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: I approve the settlement in this matter. In light of the settlement, the action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/3/2018) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.