Otto v. Hearst Communications, Inc.
| Jonathan Otto |
| Hearst Communications, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv04712 |
| June 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER: denying 142 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 142. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/03/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
141
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 139 Order in favor of Jonathan Otto against Hearst Communications, Inc. in the amount of $750.00. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 23, 2020, judgment is entered for Plaintiff in the amount of $750.00; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 1/23/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal)(km)
|
|
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies both Hearst's motion for sanctions, and Otto's cross-motion for a judgment of civil contempt and sanctions. In addition, neither party is awarded attorneys' fees. Accordi ngly, the Clerk is respectfully directed to close Docket Nos. 59 and 66 and mark each of them as denied. This Opinion and Order refers to information that has been redacted in Hearst's motion papers, and accordingly will be temporarily filed und er seal (and provided to the parties in unredacted form by email). The Court directs the parties to send a joint letter to the Court by email to CottNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov within 5 business days of the date of this Opinion and Order wi th any proposed redactions for the Court's review. The parties should be mindful of the presumption of public access to judicial documents in proposing any redactions, as notwithstanding the issues related to the confidentiality of the settleme nt conference, the Court believes it is in the public interest to publish this opinion without any redactions unless the parties can justify them. See, e.g., Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court will then determine how this Opinion and Order may be filed on the public docket. Until further order of the Court, the Clerk is respectfully directed to file this Opinion and Order under seal. (This document was previously sealed in envelope #92 and unsealed on 3/5/2019.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 2/21/2018) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Hearst Communications, Inc., 55 MOTION to Strike Document No. [38, 39] the February 22, 2018 Declaration of Donna Halperin and Certain Paragraphs of the F ebruary 24, 2018 Declaration of Jonathan Otto. filed by Hearst Communications, Inc., 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Hearst Communications, Inc. on liability for Copyright Infringement. filed by Jonathan Otto.F or the foregoing reasons, Ottos motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED on the issues of Hearst's liability for copyright infringement and Hearst's assertion of its affirmative defenses. Hearst's motion for partial summary jud gment is DENIED on both the issues of fair use and willfulness. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 36, 51, and 55. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/10/2018) (js) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Otto v. Hearst Communications, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan Otto | |
| Represented By: | Richard Liebowitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hearst Communications, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Deanne Bishop |
| Represented By: | Jonathan R. Donnellan |
| Represented By: | Ravi Viren Sitwala |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
