U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Wright et al
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
Michael S. Wright and Wright Time Capital Group LLC |
1:2017cv04722 |
June 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Debra C. Freeman |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
07 U.S.C. ยง 0013 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 31 Motion for Default Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for a default judgment is granted. As detailed in the Order for Final Judgment entered concurrently with this Memorandum Order, the Court grant s Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief, imposes a restitution obligation in the total amount of $371,250, with dollar-for-dollar credit to be given for any amounts collected and disbursed in connection with this case or the companion crimin al case against Wright, and a CMP of $1,113,750, representing the trebled amount of ill-gotten profits. Interest will accrue on the judgment at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. section 1961. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entry no. 31. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/7/2018) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.