EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company
| EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, DLP Master Trust, GWG DLP Master Trust, Life Funding Trust, PF Participation Funding Trust, Palm Beach Settlement Company, DLP Master Trust II, DLP Master Trust III and Greenwich Settlements Master Trust |
| AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2017cv04767 |
| June 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
418
ORDER granting (354 in 18cv2111) Letter Motion to Seal. Based on a review of a sample of the documents at issue, the Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to further interests that are sufficient to outweigh the presumption i n favor of public access. Accordingly, the application is granted, subject to reconsideration in the event that any party or third party files a motion to unseal a particular document or documents. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 354. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/31/2023) (jca)
|
|
Filing
413
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth within, Plaintiffs' second motion in limine is GRANTED, and their fourth, fifth, and sixth motions in limine are DENIED. The Court reserves judgment on Plaintiffs' first, third, seventh, and eighth motions in limine. -- SEE ORDER. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/25/2023) (ab)
|
|
Filing
401
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth within, AXA's first and seventh motions in limine (the two that remain pending out of the seven originally filed) are hereby DENIED. SEE ORDER. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/24/2023) (ab)
|
|
Filing
396
ORDER. The Court has received and reviewed the request for electronic devices submitted by counsel for Defendant and believes the request is grossly excessive. Mindful of what the Court already approved for the EFG Plaintiffs, the Court is prepared to allow the following as further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/23/23) (yv)
|
|
Filing
387
ORDER As stated on the record during the conference held earlier today: In light of ongoing efforts to consummate the settlement in 18-CV-2111, the LSH Plaintiffs' deadline to serve summary exhibits pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is hereby extended to October 13, 2023. The original deadline remains in effect for all other parties. In addition, all other dates and deadlines in the Court's March 3, 2023 Scheduling Order, ECF No. 676, remain in effect. In light of the settle ment in 18-CV-2111, Defendant's third, fourth, fifth, and sixth motions in limine are hereby DENIED as moot. See ECF No. 312. No later than October 10, 2023, the parties in the two remaining cases shall file a joint letter informing the Court of their respective positions on whether or how the settlement impacts Defendants second motion in limine to prelude Plaintiffs from offering evidence and argument concerning self-support testing requirements for in-force illustrations. See id. The parties in the remaining two cases shall file a revised joint pretrial order no later than October 16, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/5/2023) (jca)
|
|
Filing
369
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (662 in 1:16-cv-00740-JMF) MOTION for Antonia M. Apps to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Antonia Apps as counsel and to terminate ECF No. 662. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/5/2023) (jca)
|
|
Filing
365
ORDER granting (653 in 1:16-cv-00740-JMF) LETTER MOTION to Expedite Consideration to Terminate Croft and Peterson from Related Action. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to designate cases 17-cv-09355 and 18-cv-10730 as no longer related to case 16-cv-00740. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 653. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/03/2022) (jca) Transmission to Attorney Services/Help Desk.
|
|
Filing
352
ORDER granting [600 in Case 16-cv-740] Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 600. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/11/2022) (tro)
|
|
Filing
351
MEMO ENDORSEMENT ON MOTION AND ORDER FOR JERRY MARKS, ANDREA HOOD, ANDELENA KILBERG TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL: ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. Attorney Jerry Lee Marks; Andrea Gail Hood and Elena Kilberg terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/15/2022) (js)
|
|
Filing
346
ORDER granting (489 in 1:16-cv-00740-JMF) LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excel spreadsheets via FTP site (copying opposing counsel), and file slip sheets via ECF for all such Excel spreadsheets transmitted via FTP. The Application is GRANTED. All do cuments filed in connection with the motion -- including those filed by the method as laid out below -- will be considered judicial documents. Accordingly, they will be subject to a presumption in favor of public access, even if they do not appear on the docket itself. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 489. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/22/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
285
ORDER granting 272 Motion to Seal Document. Application GRANTED. If they have not done so already, Plaintiffs shall promptly file unredacted copies of the relevant documents with the Sealed Records Department. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 272. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/18/2019) (ne)
|
|
Filing
142
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: on re: 113 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 105 Order on Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference, filed by EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch. In short, EFG fails to establish with "sufficient part icularity and specificity" that Article 271 would prohibit disclosure of the materials at issue here in the absence of a court order threatening criminal sanctions. Alfadda, 149 F.R.D. at 34. There is, of course, no such order in place here. Moreover, there is no reason to believe that the Court will impose sanctions of any kind, let alone criminal sanctions, as EFG represents that it is ready and willing to produce the materials at issue. (EFG's Br. 1 ("EFG wants nothing mo re than to complete its production of documents in this case and proceed promptly with the remainder of discovery.")). Accordingly, EFG's motion for reconsideration of the Court's denial of its request for a protective order is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 113, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/20/2018) (ap) Modified on 4/20/2018 (ap).
|
|
Filing
102
OPINION AND ORDER re: (64 in 1:17-cv-04803-JMF) MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion for Partial Dismissal of the First Amended Complaint, filed by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, (75 in 1:17-cv-04767-JMF) MOTION to Dismiss Notic e of Motion for Partial Dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint, filed by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. For the foregoing reasons, AXAs partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' implied-covenant claims, punitive damag es claims, and declaratory judgment claims are dismissed. AXA shall file its answer to Plaintiffs' remaining claims within twenty-one days of the date of this Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/14/2018) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
