Ross v. Portchester Housing Authority et al
| Christopher Ross |
| Portchester Housing Authority, Village of Port Chester, Kevin Munnelly and Robert J. Vyskocil |
| 1:2017cv04770 |
| June 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Unassigned |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Portchester Housing Authority, 78 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kevin Munnelly, Village of Port Chester. For the foregoing reasons, the following of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prej udice: as set forth herein. The following of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice: as set forth herein. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at ECF Nos. 68 and 78. Plaintiff is directed to f ile a Second Amended Complaint by October 25, 2019. Failure to timely do so may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Finally, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this decision to the Plaintiff at his last address listed on ECF and to file proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED., ( Amended Pleadings due by 10/25/2019.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 9/27/2019) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
