Wang v. Enlander

Wang v. Enlander

Plaintiff:	Hongxia Wang
Defendant:	Derek Enlander
Case Number:	1:2017cv04932
Filed:	June 29, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 6, 2018	Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Derek Enlander. Defendant's motion to dismiss the § 1584 and § 1590 claims is granted as to conduct before December 19, 2003, but otherwise is denied; and the moti on to dismiss the § 1589 claim is granted as to conduct before December 23, 2008, but otherwise is denied. The motion to dismiss the contract claim is granted as to the loan repayments, and the implied employment agreement that began in 2003, but denied as to the parties' implied employment agreement beginning in 2006. The motion to dismiss the quasi-contract and unjust enrichment claims is granted as to the wage claims before 2006 and the loan repayment claims in their entirety, but denied as to the wage claims between 2006 and 2011. The motion is granted as to each of the fraud claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 20. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/6/2018) (kgo)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 6, 2018

Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Derek Enlander. Defendant's motion to dismiss the § 1584 and § 1590 claims is granted as to conduct before December 19, 2003, but otherwise is denied; and the moti on to dismiss the § 1589 claim is granted as to conduct before December 23, 2008, but otherwise is denied. The motion to dismiss the contract claim is granted as to the loan repayments, and the implied employment agreement that began in 2003, but denied as to the parties' implied employment agreement beginning in 2006. The motion to dismiss the quasi-contract and unjust enrichment claims is granted as to the wage claims before 2006 and the loan repayment claims in their entirety, but denied as to the wage claims between 2006 and 2011. The motion is granted as to each of the fraud claims. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket No. 20. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/6/2018) (kgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wang v. Enlander
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hongxia Wang
Represented By:	Dahsong Kim
Represented By:	Sirui Sherry Xia
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Derek Enlander
Represented By:	Stanley Kalmon Schlein
Represented By:	Marissa Soto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?