3DT Holdings LLC v. Bard Access Systems Inc.
Plaintiff: 3DT Holdings LLC
Defendant: Bard Access Systems Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv05463
Filed: July 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Laura Taylor Swain
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER denying as moot 123 Letter Motion to Seal; denying as moot 130 Letter Motion to Seal; denying as moot 136 Letter Motion to Seal; denying as moot 158 Letter Motion to Seal; denying as moot 168 Letter Motion to Seal; denying as moot [1 76] Letter Motion to Seal. It is hereby ORDERED that the motions to seal at Dkt. Nos. 123, 130, 136, 158, 168, and 176 are DENIED as moot. The parties are directed to file on the docket unredacted versions of the documents that were the subject of these motions by July 18, 2022. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 7/11/2022) (ate)
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 213 ORDER: There are pending motions to seal in this case. Trial was held in open court, and the parties represented that the trial transcripts did not need to be filed under seal. Thus, much of the information that has been previously requested to be filed under seal is now in the public domain. The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer and to, no later than July 8, 2022, submit to the Court a joint letter explaining what portions, if any, of the documents that are the subject of t he pending motions at Dkt. Nos. 123, 130, 136, 158, 168, and 176 should remain redacted or under seal. The parties should be as specific as possible, identifying by page and line number the content (word, sentence, page, or document) that should remain under seal and providing a brief explanation for why such content should remain under seal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 6/24/2022) (va)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 181 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 163 Motion in Limine. The motion to exclude the witness Ed Burnside is DENIED on the condition that Burnside be made available for deposition on May 18, May 19, or May 20, 2022, as reasonably selected by Plaintiff's counsel. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. No. 163. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 5/17/2022) (va)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER with respect to 163 Motion in Limine. It is HEREBY ORDERED that any reply in further support of Plaintiff's motion to exclude witness Ed Burnside must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2022. Any objections to the admission of direct testimony must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on May 20, 2022, identifying the paragraph to which there is an objection and the basis for the objection. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 5/16/2022) (tg)
April 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that the bench trial currently scheduled in this case for May 9, 2022 is rescheduled to May 23, 2022. The Final Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for May 5, 2022 is rescheduled to May 20, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. The Final Pretrial Conference will proceed by telephone; parties are directed to dial in to the Court's teleconference line at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101#. It is further ORDERED that the Joint Pretrial Order and any declarations shall be s ubmitted by May 13, 2022. Any replies shall be submitted by May 18, 2022. SO ORDERED. ( Pretrial Order due by 5/13/2022., Telephone Conference set for 5/20/2022 at 12:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 4/28/2022) (vfr)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 118 Letter granting in part and denying in part 71 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 74 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 81 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in pa rt and denying in part 85 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 91 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 93 Letter Motion to Seal; granting and denying in part 97 Letter Motion to Seal. ENDOR SEMENT: The redactions proposed below are approved. The motions to seal at Dkt. Nos. 71, 74, 81, 85, 91, 93, and 97 are granted insofar as they request the redactions set forth in this submission. To the extent those motions seek additional redac tions, they are denied. By March 4, 2022, the parties shall directed to file on the public docket the relevant documents with the permitted redactions. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 71, 74, 81, 85, 91, 93, and 97. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/28/2022) (vfr)
February 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that the trial currently scheduled in this case for May 9, 2022 shall proceed as a bench trial in Courtroom 15C of the 500 Pearl Street Courthouse. In addition to the previously scheduled conference and deadline cont ained in the Order at Dkt. No. 103, the Court will hold a telephonic conference on March 25, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. to discuss the process for the bench trial, including the submission of direct testimony by declaration. SO ORDERED. ( Bench Trial set for 5/9/2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman., Telephone Conference set for 3/25/2022 at 4:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/24/2022) (vfr)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER: The parties have filed various motions for certain documents associated with their summary judgment motions to be filed under seal, at Dkt. Nos.71, 74, 81, 85, 91, 93, 97. The Court has now had a hearing on the summary judgment motions a nd has published an opinion with limited redactions on the same. The parties are directed to review the proposed redactions in their prior submissions against the redactions permitted in the Court's Order and Opinion at Dkt. No. 109 and the s tandards set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), and its progeny. By February 17, 2022, the parties shall submit a joint letter listing the redactions that should remain with no more than one sentence for each document for which confidentiality is sought explaining the basis for the request, addressing whether the information has been publicly disclosed, and addressing whether disclosure at the present time would cause competitive or other serious harm. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/10/2022) (va)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the Opinion and Order filed by the Court today, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In order the preserve the ability of the parties to move the Court for redactions to the Opinion and Order, the Opinion and Order is temporarily filed under seal. The parties shall meet and confer with respect to potential redactions and, within one week of the date of this Order-i.e., by February 4, 2022-they shall file jointly a document with their proposed redactions. The Court will rule on any outstanding motions to seal at the same time that it rules on any proposed redactions to the Opinion and Order. I n light of the Court's determination that there are triable issues of fact in this case, a Jury Trial is scheduled for May 9, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. A Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for May 4, 2022 at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 15C of the 500 Pea rl Street Courthouse. The joint pretrial order shall be filed on April 22, 2022. ( Pretrial Order due by 4/22/2022.), ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman., Jury Trial set for 5/9/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 1/28/2022) (ate)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER: The Court has before it pending motions for summary judgment. The parties are directed to appear for oral argument on the pending motions on January 21, 2022 at 2 p.m. Oral argument will take place in Courtroom 15C of the 500 Pearl Street Courthouse. SO ORDERED. ( Oral Argument set for 1/21/2022 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 12/27/2021) (vfr)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. The application with respect to the timing of motion papers and their length is GRANTED. The application with respect to sealing is DENIED because it is inc onsistent with the Second Circuit's decision in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F. 3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Parties are directed to use redactions to the best of their abilities and to file a motion to seal consistent with the Court's Individual Practices. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/25/2021) (va)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a post-discovery conference on September 28, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15C of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The September 19, 2020 summary judgment motion deadline contained in the February 14, 2020 Order (Dkt. No. 44) is CANCELLED. In advance of the above-mentioned conference and no later than September 14, 2020, any party intending to move for summary judgment shall file on ECF a letter, not to exceed three pages in length, setting forth the basis for the anticipated summary judgment motion, including the legal standards and elements governing the claims at issue. Any party intending to oppose th at motion shall file on ECF a letter, not to exceed three pages in length, setting forth anticipated arguments in opposition by September 21, 2020. The content and time for any anticipated motions for summary judgment will be discussed at the Septemb er 28, 2020 status conference. The deadline for submission of a Joint Pretrial Order will be discussed at the September 28, 2020 conference. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 9/14/2020, Responses due by 9/21/2020, Status Conference set for 9/28/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 15C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/26/2020) (va)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 3DT Holdings LLC v. Bard Access Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 3DT Holdings LLC
Represented By: Deanna Lynn Koestel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bard Access Systems Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?