Hogan v. CBS Corporation et al
| Thomas Hogan |
| CBS Corporation and Jeffrey Birch |
| 1:2017cv05764 |
| July 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER: On December 1, 2017, the Court stayed this matter to permit the New York State Division of Human Rights ("NYSDHR") time to address Plaintiff's extant request to reopen his administrative proceeding. (Dkt. #16). Since then, th e parties have given the Court regular status updates, all relaying that they have not received any correspondence or further communication from the NYSDHR. (Dkt. #19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40). In anticipation of the parties 9; next status update, due on August 1, 2022, the Court conducted its own inquiry of the NYSDHR. (Dkt. #41). It was advised that from the agency's perspective, the latest activity in Plaintiff's case occurred in March 2017, when the a gency dismissed Plaintiff's complaint for lack of probable cause. The agency has no record of a written request from Plaintiff to reopen this proceeding. The Court instructs the parties to consider this information as they prepare their next status letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/12/2022) (vfr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
