Needham v. United States of America
| Derriyln Needham |
| United States of America |
| 1:2017cv05944 |
| August 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER: The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/8/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER: The case management conference scheduled for 10:30am on January 10, 2020 is hereby canceled. The parties are directed to submit a joint status report by Friday, January 10, 2020 informing the Court of whether they wish to extend discovery, set a schedule for dispositive motions, ask the Court's assistance in facilitating settlement, or set a date for trial. If the parties have reached a settlement in principle, they may ask the Court to enter a 30-Day Order, which will discontinue the action and provide the parties with 30 days from the date of issuance to request that the action be reopened should settlement not be consummated. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/3/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint in Part: For the reasons set forth above, the United States' motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Needham's negligent screening, hiring, and training claims. As the Govern ment has not moved to dismiss Needham's negligent supervision claim, that claims survives. That parties are directed to appear for an Initial Pretrial Conference on August 16, 2018 at 11:45 am. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 22. (Initial Conference set for 8/16/2018 at 11:45 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/26/2018) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Needham v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derriyln Needham | |
| Represented By: | Robert A Soloway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
