You v. Pedro Teixeira, Inc. et al
| Jin Yue You |
| Pedro Teixeira, Inc. and Maykel Feliz-Tejeda |
| 1:2017cv06028 |
| August 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the teleconference scheduled for September 17 at 2:30 p.m. is adjourned to November 30 at 9:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 11/30/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein., Telephone Conference set for 11/30/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 9/15/2021) (jca)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice once the decree has been issued. If no stipulation of discontinuance has been filed by July 9, 2021, there will be a status conference on that date at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 23A, U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. The jury trial scheduled to begin on March 9, 2021 is adjourned sine die. (As further set forth in this Order.) ( Status Conference set for 7/9/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 23A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/8/2021) (cf)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: The Court wishes to bring to the parties' attention, Local Rule 47.1, Assessment of Jury Costs, of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/4/2021) (nb)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER: A teleconference having been held today, with counsel for all parties participating, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The defendants' submissions are due by Wednesday, February 24, 2021, at noon; and 2. The plaintiff's response to the submissions are due by March 1, 2021, at noon. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 2/18/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER. Oral argument via teleconference having been held today on the pending motions in limine, with counsel for all parties participating, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The motions in limine [Doc. Nos. 48, 50, 51] are decided for the reasons as set forth on the record; 2. The trial of this matter remains at March 9, 2021, at 9:30 a.m.; and 3. The parties shall notify the Court if they wish to have a conference on March 8, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. So ordered. Terminating 48 Motion in Limine; Terminating 50 Motion in Limine; Terminating 51 Motion in Limine. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 1/6/2021) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: As set forth in this Court's order dated December 9, 2020 [Doc No. 74], the final pretrial conference in this matter will take place via teleconference on December 18, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. All participants must identify themselves every t ime they speak, spell any proper names for the court reporter, and take care not to interrupt or speak over one another. Finally, all of those accessing the conference whether in listen-only mode or otherwise are reminded that recording or rebroad casting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. Counsel should adhere to the following rules and guidelines during the teleconference: Each party should designate a single lawyer to speak on its behalf (including when noting the appearances of other counsel on the telephone). Counsel should use a landline whenever possible, should use a headset instead of a speakerphone, and must mute themselves whenever they are not speaking to eliminate background noise. In addition, counsel should not use vo ice-activated systems that do not allow the user to know when someone else is trying to speak at the same time. To facilitate an orderly teleconference and the creation of an accurate transcript, counsel are required to identify themselves every time they speak. Counsel should spell any proper names for the court reporter. Counsel should also take special care not to interrupt or speak over one another. If there is a beep or chime indicating that a new caller has joined while counsel is speakin g, counsel should pause to allow the Court to ascertain the identity of the new participant and confirm that the court reporter has not been dropped from the call. The parties shall dial 888-273-3658 and use access code 7004275 to join the teleconference. (Telephone Conference set for 12/18/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Sidney H. Stein.) (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 12/10/2020) (nb)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement conference scheduled previously in the above-captioned action for July 7, 2020, shall be held on July 14, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. The conference shall be held by telephone. The parties are directed to ca ll (888) 557-8511 and, thereafter, enter access code 4862532. The parties are also directed to review and comply with the undersigned's Procedures Applicable to Cases Referred for Settlement, which may be found on the Court's website. As set forth in the procedures, no later than 3 days before the conference the parties must provide Judge Fox: (1) a pre-conference letter; and (2) a completed attendance form. These submissions shall be made via e-mail to laura_midwood@nysd.u scourts.gov. Additionally, at least seven days prior to the settlement conference, the parties must confer to engage in good-faith settlement negotiations. Should the parties resolve the litigation prior to the conference date, they must notify the undersigned, in writing. SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 7/14/2020 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 6/8/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 22 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Pedro Teixeira, Inc., Maykel Feliz-Tejeda. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is denied. The final pretrial conferen ce in this case is scheduled for September 18, 2020, at 12:00p.m. The parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Fox's chambers promptly to arrange for a settlement conference and, if a settlement is not concluded promptly, to consult and make their submissions in advance of the final pretrial conference in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (docket entry no. 21). This case remains referred toMagistrate Judge Fox for general pretrial management. This memorandum opinion and order resolves docket entry no. 22. SO ORDERED., ( Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/18/2020 at 12:00 PM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/26/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 39 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. In light of the pending motion(s), the final pretrial conference scheduled for May 22, 2020, is rescheduled to September 18, 2020, at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 17C. SO ORDERED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/18/2020 at 12:00 PM in Courtroom 17C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/12/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER: granting 37 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The conference is adjourned to May 22, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. The related consultation and submission deadlines are suspended pending further order of the Court. DE # 37 resolved. SO ORDERED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/22/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 2/07/2020) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
