Joaquin v. Capra

Joaquin v. Capra

Plaintiff:	Anibal Joaquin
Defendant:	Michael Capra
Case Number:	1:2017cv06191
Filed:	August 16, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Katherine B. Forrest
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 13, 2018	Filing 25 CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER. The Court concludes that: (1) the trial court's decision not to inquire into potential premature deliberations did not violate petitioners constitutional rights; and (2) the prosecutor's comments in summation did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. Accordingly, Joaquin's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/13/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (anc)
July 12, 2018	Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court concludes that: (1) the trial court's decision not to inquire into potential premature deliberations did violate petitioner's constitutional rights; and (2) the prosecutor's comments in summation did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. Accordingly, Joaquins petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/12/2018) Copies Sent By Chambers. (js)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 13, 2018

Filing 25 CORRECTED OPINION & ORDER. The Court concludes that: (1) the trial court's decision not to inquire into potential premature deliberations did not violate petitioners constitutional rights; and (2) the prosecutor's comments in summation did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. Accordingly, Joaquin's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/13/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (anc)

July 12, 2018

Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court concludes that: (1) the trial court's decision not to inquire into potential premature deliberations did violate petitioner's constitutional rights; and (2) the prosecutor's comments in summation did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. Accordingly, Joaquins petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 7/12/2018) Copies Sent By Chambers. (js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joaquin v. Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anibal Joaquin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?