District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Handyman Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff: District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O., District Council 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. and District Council No. 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Defendant: Handyman Specialists, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv06199
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. After reviewing the petition and the supporting materials, the Court finds th at there is no genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment as to all portions of the Award, as the Arbitrators decision provides more than a barely colorable justification for the outcome reached. Id. at *3 (internal quotation marks om itted). Nor is there any justification under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act for vacating the Award. Accordingly, the Court grants the Unions unopposed petition to confirm the entire Award.The Union is directed to submit a proposed Judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the Orders and Judgments Clerk of this Court by October 23, 2017.The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 16. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/16/2017) (ras)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. Handyman Specialists, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Represented By: Lauren Michelle Kugielska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: District Council 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Represented By: Lauren Michelle Kugielska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: District Council No. 9 Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.I.O.
Represented By: Lauren Michelle Kugielska
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Handyman Specialists, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?