Herron v. Fields et al
| Sheldon Herron |
| Leroy Fields, Anthony Annucci and Eric T. Schniederman |
| 1:2017cv07221 |
| October 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Colleen McMahon |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 26 Report and Recommendation. For the reasons discussed above, the Court adopts Judge Freeman's R&R in full and Herron's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court declines to i ssue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and appellate review is therefore not warranted. Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-4 5 (1962). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending deadlines and motions and close the case. The Clerk is further directed to mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Herron and to note the mailing on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 2/19/2021) (ama) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
