Deodat v. Mercer (US) Inc. et al
| Anita Deodat |
| Mercer (US) Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies |
| 1:2017cv07288 |
| September 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Marsh & McLennan Companies, Mercer (US) Inc. For those reasons, Defendants' unopposed motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Complaint is dism issed in its entirety. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Memorandum Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith and, thus, in forma pauperis status is denied. See Coppedge v. United Sta tes, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff and to close the case. Additionally, out of an abundance of caution, Defendants are also ORDERED to serve a copy of this Memorand um Opinion and Order on Plaintiff by e-mail and to file proof of such service by June 20, 2019. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/14/2019) (ne) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 100 Report and Recommendations, 77 Motion to Expedite filed by Anita Deodat. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to seek equitable relief (which is mentioned only in the tit le of the motion), the present motion is not the proper way to amend the complaint, particularly given that it would be the third amendment to the complaint. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety. Plaintiff's mo tion is DENIED. This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U. S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 77. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/19/2018) (ne) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
