Agureyev et al v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Natalie Agureyev and Darya Igamberdiev
Defendant: H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., Shaheen Khan and Maha Khondoker
Case Number: 1:2017cv07336
Filed: September 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 77 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Natalie Agureyev against H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., Maha Khondoker, Shaheen Khan; in favor of Darya Igamberdiev against H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., Maha Khondoker, Shaheen Khan; in favor of Darya Igamberdiev , Natalie Agureyev against H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., Maha Khondoker, Shaheen Khan in the amount of $35,906.34. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That pursuant to the Court's Memorandum and Opinion dated March 5, 2021, Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs are awarded judgment against Defendants in the total amount of $35,906.34, comprised of the following: (I) Agureyev is awarded damages in the amount of $4,508.96, comprised of (i) $1 ,386.88 in unpaid minimum wages; (ii) $164.06 in unpaid overtime wages; (iii) $8.75 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; (iv) $1,559.69 in liquidated damages; (v) $1,050.00 in statutory damages, and (vi) $339.58 in prejudgment interest; (2) Igamberediev is awarded damages in the amount of $12,117.38, comprised of (i) $4,145.40 in unpaid minimum wages; (ii) $35.00 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; (iii) $4,180.40 in liquidated damages; (iv) $2,900 .00 in statutory damages, and (v) $856.58 in prejudgment interest; and (3) $19,280 in attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Khondokar are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/8/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 75 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants HK Second Ave Restaurant Inc and Shaheen Khan, filed by Natalie Agureyev. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED and Plainti ffs are awarded judgment against Defendants in the total amount of $35,906.34, comprised of the following: (1) Agureyev is awarded damages in the amount of $4,508.96, comprised of (i) $1,386.88 in unpaid minimum wages; (ii) $ 164.06 in unpaid overtime wages; (iii) $8.75 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; (iv) $1,559.69 in liquidated damages; (v) $1,050.00 in statutory damages, and (vi) $339.58 in prejudgment interest; (2) Igamberediev is awarded da mages in the amount of $12,117.38, comprised of (i) $4,145.40 in unpaid minimum wages; (ii) $35.00 in unpaid spread-of-hours wages; (iii) $4,180.40 in liquidated damages; (iv) $2,900.00 in statutory damages, and (v) � 36;856.58 in prejudgment interest; and (3) $19,280 in attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Khondokar are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 75. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 3/5/2021) (va) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER TO INITIATE DEFAULT PROCEEDINGS, Defendants have not retained new counsel, and Plaintiffs have not moved for default. Plaintiffs are now ORDERED to request a Certificate of Default from the Clerk of Court by August 7, 2020 and to file a Motion for Default Judgment in accordance with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and S.D.N.Y. Local Rule 55 by August 14, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 8/14/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/31/20) (yv)
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting 62 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference: The requested adjournment is GRANTED. The telephone conference currently scheduled for tomorrow, June 9, 2020 at 11:00 am will now be held at 12:30 pm on the same date. The parties are direct ed to call the Court's conference line as instructed at the scheduled time. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to amend the conference time and to close the Letter-Motion at ECF No. 62. (Telephone Conference set for 6/9/2020 at 12:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 6/8/2020) (jwh)
April 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER SCHEDULING TELEPHONE CONFERENCE, A telephone status conference will be held in this matter on Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 11:00 am. The parties are directed to call the Court's conference line at 866-390-1828, access code 380-9799, at the scheduled time. SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 4/22/2020 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 4/15/20) (yv)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 52 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference: The status conference currently scheduled for January 23, 2020 is ADJOURNED until February 12, 2020 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl St., New York, New York. The Clerk of Court is respe ctfully directed to close the Letter-Motion at ECF No. 52. (Status Conference set for 2/12/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/14/2020) (jwh)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER FOR STATUS CONFERENCE, The parties are now ORDERED to appear for an in-person status conference on Thursday, January 23, 2020 at 11:30 am in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. Defendants are warned that failure to appear at t his conference may result in sanctions. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 1/23/2020 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/13/20) (yv)
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT. As defendants have still failed to supply the Court or Plaintiffs with an update on the status of the supposed bankruptcy filing, defendants are hereby ORDERED to file such a status report by no later than January 10, 2020. Failure to do so will result in the Court ordering the parties to resume discovery in this case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 1/3/20) (yv)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER. Per the Order at ECF No. 44, the parties were directed to file a joint letter on the status of the bankruptcy filing by December 2, 2019. The parties are now ORDERED to file a joint status report by December 10, 2019 explaining their failure to comply with the Court's order and informing Court of the status of the bankruptcy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 12/3/19) (yv)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc., Shaheen Khan. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' FLS A claims is denied. Defendants are directed to serve and file their answer no later than September 26, 2018. All counsel are ro report for a scheduling conference on October 4, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 18-A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New Yor k. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark Docket Item 20 closed. SO ORDERED. (H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc. answer due 9/26/2018; Shaheen Khan answer due 9/26/2018; Maha Khondoker answer due 9/26/2018.) (Scheduling Conference set for 10/4/2018 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 18A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/12/2018) (ne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Agureyev et al v. H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Agureyev
Represented By: Matthew Paul Madzelan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darya Igamberdiev
Represented By: Matthew Paul Madzelan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H.K. Second Ave Restaurant Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shaheen Khan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maha Khondoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?