S. Katzman Produce, Inc. et al v. JAT Beverage Inc. et al
| S. Katzman Produce, Inc. and Katzman Berry Corp. |
| JAT Beverage Inc., Starlight Food Service Inc., Ariel L Tejada and Daniel E Tejada |
| 1:2017cv07930 |
| October 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Barbara C. Moses |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for default judgment as against Rodriguez is granted. Plaintiffs are hereby awarded judgment against Rodriguez in the principal amount of $125,900.41, plus accrued in terest at an annual rate of 18% through May 22, 2018, in the amount of $24,517.60, and accrued attorneys' fees through May 22, 2018, in the amount of$67,274.66, for a total judgment in the amount of $217,692.67. Plaintiffs mu st credit any further payment by the JAT Defendants against Rodriguez's liability. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. This Memorandum Order resolves docket entry no. 123. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/7/2018) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
