Newmont Mining Corporation v. AngloGold Ashanti Limited et al
| Newmont Mining Corporation |
| AngloGold Ashanti Limited, AngloGold Ashanti North America, Inc., AngloGold Ashanti USA Incorporated and Wayne M. Chancellor |
| 1:2017cv08065 |
| October 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 143 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of AngloGold Ashanti Limited, AngloGold Ashanti North America, Inc., AngloGold Ashanti USA Incorporated, Wayne M. Chancellor against Newmont Mining Corporation. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated March 18, 2020, Defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/18/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting 139 Motion to Seal Document. The Court has reviewed Newmont Exhibits 83-84. 131-132, and 140-143. These exhibits appear to consist of "business information... which. if revealed, may provide valuable insights into [Newmont&qu ot;s] current business practices that a competitor [might] seek to exploit." Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp. 97 F. Supp. 3d 485. 511 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (citation omitted). Accordingly. Plaintiff's request for leave to file these exhibits under seal is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/6/2020) (rj)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER granting 127 LETTER MOTION to Seal Document 126 Declaration in Opposition to Motion. Plaintiff seeks to file under seal certain exhibits submitted in connection with its oppositions to Defendants' motions for summary judgment. The Court grants Plaintiffs request as to AGA Exhibits 30 and 31, which appear to consist of "business information...which, if revealed, may provide valuable insights into [AGA's] current business practices that a competitor [might] seek to exploit." Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp., 97 F. Supp. 3d 485,511 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (citation omitted). Accordingly, Plaintiffs request for leave to file a redacted copy of Exhibit 30 on the docket and to file Exhibit 31 in its entirety under seal is granted. It is not clear to the Court, however, exactly which Newmont Exhibits Plaintiff seeks to file under seal. On the first page of this letter, Plaintiff lists Exhibits 83-84, 131-132, and 140-143. On the second page, Plaintiff discusses Exhibits 84-85, 132-133, and 141-144. The hard copies delivered to the Court are labeled Exhibits 83-84, 131-132, and 140-143, but the contents appear to relate to Exhibits 84-85, 132-133, and 141-144, as detailed in the Declaration of Gregory P. Szewczyk. No later than January 7, 2020, Plaintiff shall clarify which Newmont Exhibits it seeks to file under seal, and shall email the Court both a highlighted set and a clean, unredacted set of those exhibits. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/2/2020) (jca)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER: The Court will hold oral argument as to Defendants' motions for summary judgment on January 9, 2020, at 3 p.m., in Courtroom 1506 at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007., Oral Argument set for 1/9/2020 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 1506, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Ronnie Abrams. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/25/2019) (rj)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by AngloGold Ashanti North America, Inc., 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) filed by Wayne M. Chancellor, 21 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by AngloGold Ashanti USA Incorporated, Wayne M. Chancellor, AngloGold Ashanti Limited, AngloGold Ashanti North America, Inc. As explained above, AngloGold's motion to compel arbitration is granted and the case is stayed as to the Purchase Price Adjustment claim only; Chancellor's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied; and Defendants' motion to dismiss Newmont's claims relating to the purported third-party mineral interests in a plot of land on Victor Mining's property is granted. Plaintiff may amend the Complaint so long as it does so no later than October 18, 2018. As soon as practicable thereafter, and in no event later than October 25, 2018, the parties shall confer and su bmit to the Court a letter explaining how Defendants intend to respond to the amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkts. 18, 21, and 23. SO ORDERED., ( Amended Pleadings due by 10/18/2018.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/30/2018) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
