Waters v. Lilley
| Keith Waters |
| Lynn Lilley |
| 1:2017cv08258 |
| October 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER: To ensure a complete public record, Respondent shall electronically file the state trial court transcript relevant to the above-captioned habeas petition no later than March 15, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this order to Pro Se Plaintiff: Keith Waters 60 W. 128th Street, Apt. 4A New York, NY 10027. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 3/8/2023) (tg)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: In light of Respondent's letter dated September 20, 2022 (Dkt. 24) indicating there is no reason why this case should be dismissed as moot, Petitioner need not respond to the letter as previously directed in the Court's order of S eptember 16, 2022 (Dkt. 23). Accordingly, as Petitioners time to reply expired years ago, and consistent with previous orders, the Court will decide the case based on the current record. (See Dkt. 17, 21, 23.) SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this order to Pro Se Plaintiff: Keith Waters, 60 W. 128th Street, Apt. 4A, New York, NY 10027. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 9/20/2022) (mml)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. If Petitioner no longer wishes to proceed with his habeas Petition, then he should inform the Court of this no later than May 15, 2020. 2. If Petitioner does wish to proceed with his Petition, then he is dir ected to file his reply to Respondent's opposition (Dkts. 17, 18) no later than June 12, 2020. Petitioner is cautioned that, if he fails to file a reply by that date, then the Court may reach a determination on his habeas claims based solely on the Petition itself and Respondent's submissions in opposition. 3. Any submissions that Petitioner wishes to make in response to this Order should be mailed to the Court's Pro Se Office, at the following address: United States District Cour t, S.D.N.Y., Pro Se Intake Unit, U.S. Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, Room 105, New York, New York 10007. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner, at the address currently reflected on the Docket of this action. So ordered. (Replies due by 6/12/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 5/4/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Waters v. Lilley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Keith Waters | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lynn Lilley | |
| Represented By: | Deborah L. Morse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
