Leckie v. Robinson et al
| Naquan Leckie |
| Sean Robinson and Mauro Gonzales |
| 1:2017cv08727 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 78 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. in favor of Mauro Gonzales, Sean Robinson against Naquan Leckie. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated M ay 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses's R&R is adopted, and Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 05/04/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff will have until March 20, 2020 to file any objections to the R&R. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this order and of the R&R (Dkt. No. 75) by overnight mail to pro se Plaintiff Naquan Leckie, 501 New York Ave., #6D, Brooklyn, New York, 11225. (Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2020) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/6/2020) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
