Colon et al v. DeVos et al
Yvette Colon and Tina Carr |
Elisabeth DeVos and Navient Corporation |
1:2017cv08790 |
November 12, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim. filed by Elisabeth DeVos. For the reasons above, Defendant Elizabeth DeVos's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claims against the Secretary are dismissed, and the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate her as a Defendant in this case. As this dismisses the sole count of Plaintiff Carr, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate her from the case as well. Count Th ree was stayed in favor of arbitration by stipulation between the parties. (Dkt. #79). Plaintiff Colon and the remaining Defendants are hereby ORDERED to provide a joint letter to the Court on or before March 22, 2019, stating how they intend to proc eed regarding Count Two of the Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 59. SO ORDERED. (Tina Carr and Elisabeth DeVos (in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education) terminated.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/25/2019) (rro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.