Fujifilm North America Corporation v. PLR IP Holdings, LLC et al
| Fujifilm North America Corporation |
| PLR IP Holdings, LLC and PLR Brand Services, LLC |
| 1:2017cv08796 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Naomi Reice Buchwald |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 120 Motion to Substitute Party. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 1/6/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting 92 Letter Motion to Stay. Application Granted. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/22/2020) (ama)
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER terminating 89 Letter Motion to Stay: This Memorandum and Order responds to the parties' letters of March 11, 2020 addressing Polaroid's request for a 90-day stay of all discovery because of the rapidly changing situ ation concerning COVID-19. Fujifilm has opposed the request. Having considered the parties' letters and the news events even since the letters were filed, the Court orders a 45-day stay of all discovery during which the Court expects the parties to fully cooperate with each other to maximize progress in this case consistent with objective issues related to COVID-19. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 89. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 3/12/2020) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
