Ashmeade v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al
| Keith H. Ashmeade |
| Citizens Bank and Jennifer Depeau |
| 1:2017cv08994 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Employment |
| 11 U.S.C. ยง 525 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in its Entirety or, Alternatively, to Strike Certain Allegations. filed by Jennifer Depeau, Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Citizens Bank, Citizens Securities, Inc. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. As explained above, the defendant's motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Ashmeade's claims of bankruptcy discrimination under the NYSHRL, wrongful termination, and defamation as to all defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Ashemeade's claims of discrimination on the basis of bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 525(b) and his claims of racial discrimination under Title VII are dismissed with prejudice only against Depeau and CFG. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at docket number 23. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/22/2018) (ne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
