Lennon Image Technologies, LLC v. Coty Inc.
| Lennon Image Technologies, LLC |
| Coty Inc. |
| Jeff Kaplan |
| 1:2017cv09146 |
| November 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 126 Motion to Dismiss. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice and Defendant's counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the gavel at Document 126. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/16/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER... It is hereby: ORDERED that this case is terminated. The Clerk is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/25/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER: It has been reported to the Court that this case has settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/23/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER: In light of recent public health developments, the settlement conference scheduled for Tuesday, March 17, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. will be conducted telephonically rather than in person. The Court will provide dial-in information by email prior to the conference. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 03/12/2020) (ras)
|
|
Filing
115
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER: A settlement conference is scheduled for Tuesday, March 17, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 219, Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. The parties are directed to review and comply with t he Procedures for Cases Referred for Settlement to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, a copy of which is available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-sarah-netburn. The parties are strongly encouraged to engage in good-faith settlement negotiations before the settlement conference and preferably before the submission to the Court of the Ex Parte Settlement Letters and Acknowledgment Forms, which are to be submitted by Tuesday, March 10, 2020. Should the parties reso lve the litigation before the conference date, they must notify the Court in writing immediately. (Settlement Conference set for 3/17/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 219, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/9/2020) (ras)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER: On Tuesday, December 10, 2019, the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick assigned this matter to my docket for settlement. In light of the Court's busy calendar, settlement conferences must generally be scheduled at least six to eight weeks in advance. The Court will likely be unable to accommodate last-minute requests for settlement conferences, and the parties should not anticipate that litigation deadlines will be adjourned in response to late requests for settlement conferences. As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Rachel Slusher with both parties on the line, at (212) 805-0286, to schedule a settlement conference for a time when they believe it would be productive. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 12/11/2019) (ras)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a letter setting forth its position as to why a referral to Magistrate Judge Netburn for a settlement conference is not appropriate. If necessary, Plaintiff may submit its letter to the chamber's email inbox at BroderickNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/6/2019) (jca)
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION & ORDER: Because Plaintiff has alleged a plausible claim for patent infringement against Defendant, Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED. The Defendant shall file an answer to the Complaint by on or before August 3, 2018, and I will set a date for an initial pre-trial conference at the time that Defendant files its answer. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions in this case. Coty Inc. answer due 8/3/2017. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/18/2018) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
