Farmer v. Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc. et al
| Richard Farmer |
| Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc., Dental Associates of New York LLP, Greenwald & Matani PTR, David Forest Gross, Munkund J. Matani and Gary Greenwald |
| 1:2017cv09300 |
| November 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Unassigned |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 127 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, in favor of 3-Eyed Optical, Inc., Dental Associates of New York LLP, FZOAD.COM Enterprises, Inc., Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc., Greenwald & Matani PTR, Manhattan Eyeworks, In c., Triple Vision Corp., David Forest Gross, David Forrest Gross, David Forrest Gross O.D., Frank Christian Fico, Gary Greenwald, Marina Kleyman, Mukund J. Matani against Richard Farmer. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reaso ns stated in the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated June 28, 2021, Magistrate Judge Wang's Report is adopted; Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint is granted; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 6/29/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt) (Main Document 128 replaced on 6/29/2021) (dt).
|
|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER for 124 Motion to Dismiss,, filed by 3-Eyed Optical, Inc., David Forest Gross, Fzoad.com Enterprises Inc., David Forrest Gross, Marina Kleyman, Frank Christian Fico, FZOAD.COM Enterprises, Inc., Manhattan Eyeworks, Inc., Triple Vision Corp., David Forrest Gross O.D., 126 Report and Recommendations. Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang's May 5, 2021 Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), recommending that the motion to dismiss be granted. (Report, ECF No. 126, at 1.) Magistrate Judge Wang advised the parties that failure to file timely objections would constitute a waiver of those objections on appeal.(Id. at 8.) No objections have been filed. Having reviewed th e Report for clear error and finding none, this Court ADOPTS the Report in full. Magistrate Judge Wang's Report is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, (ECF No. 124), is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion and this case accordingly. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 6/28/2021) (ate) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to respond by April 29, 2021. Plaintiff may respond by mail to the Pro Se Office, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 or by email to temporary_pro_se_filing@nysd.uscourts.gov. Failure to respond by t hat time may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and ECF 124 to the pro se Plaintiff., (Responses due by 4/29/2021) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 4/15/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the August 7, 2020 letter submitted by Frank Fico, Marina Kleyman, Manhattan Eyeworks, Inc., 3 Eyed Optical, Inc., and Triple Vision Corp (the "New Employer Defendants") referencing a January 2, 2020 l etter (ECF 111), which the Court will construe as a motion to dismiss the New Employers Defendants. (ECF 117). Plaintiff Richard Farmer is directed to submit a letter to the Court by August 24, 2020 with the following information: When and how th e New Employer Defendants were served. Plaintiff shall attach and file any affidavits of service in his possession. Plaintiff may email his response to Temporary_Pro_Se_Filing@nysd.uscourts.gov. See attached. Failure to respond may result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute against these Defendants. The New Employer Defendants may respond within three (3) days after service of Plaintiff's letter. Counsel for the New Employer Defendants are directed to email a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff, and file an affidavit of such service within three (3) days of this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 8/10/2020) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a conference to discuss Plaintiff's sur-reply. (ECF 109). That request is DENIED; no conference is necessary at this time. The parties are reminded, however, that briefing is clos ed as to the motions to dismiss, and any future sur-reply filed without first obtaining leave of the Court will be struck from the docket. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 11/12/2019) (rro)
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Adopting REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 85 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. Magistrate Judge Wang's Report is ADOPTED. The Matani and the Employer Defendants' motions to vacate the default judgment, (ECF Nos. 36, 49), are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions accordingly. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 8/21/2019) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
