Walker v. The City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Michael Walker
Defendant: The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Carolyn Sanders, Nadene Pinnock, Health and Hospital Corporation, Vicki Burgess, Nina Edwards and John and Jane Does 1 thru 20
Case Number: 1:2017cv09414
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER: Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal for the Court to So Order. Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be directed to appear before the Court, without t he necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a final discontinuance of the action with prej udice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case...., Mo tions terminated: 91 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Christopher Ferreira, Esq. dated December 17, 2019. filed by The City of New York, Vicki Burgess, NYC Health + Hospitals, Nina Edwards, Carolyn Sanders, Cynthia Braun, Nadene Pinnock, 82 MOTION to Amend/Correct 2 Complaint. filed by Michael Walker. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/20/2019) (rj)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER: On October 15, 2019, the Court entered a briefing schedule concerning Plaintiff's anticipated motion to amend his complaint. (Dkt. #81). Plaintiff was to file his motion to amend on or before November 29, 2019, and Defendants were to file their opposition papers on or before December 20, 2019. (Id.). Plaintiff was not granted leave to file reply papers in further support of his motion to amend. (Id.). On October 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed his motion to amend the complaint (Dkt . #82), with a supplemental motion papers filed on November 4, 2019. (Dkt. #83). Plaintiff filed a proposed amended complaint on November 14, 2019. (Dkt. #85, 86). Since that time, Plaintiff has filed two supplemental letters concerning his motion to amend (Dkt. #87, 88), and a supplemental proposed amended complaint (Dkt. #89). The Court will consider all of these submissions as Plaintiff's papers in support of his motion to amend. The Court will not consider further submissions, as the deadline to file the motion to amend has passed. (Dkt. #81). Defendants shall file their opposition papers on or before December 20, 2019. Thereafter, the Court will decide Plaintiff's pending motion to amend. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/2/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rro)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 OPINION AND ORDER re: 35 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by The City of New York, Vicki Burgess, NYC Health + Hospitals, Nina Edwards, Carolyn Sanders, Cynthia Braun, Nadene Pinnock. For the reasons stated in this Opinion, Defend ants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claims under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act for assistive devices, a sighted guide, and changes in housing remain viable. His other claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 35. Per the Court's individual rules, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer and submit a proposed case management plan to the Court on or before March 15, 2019. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/12/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Ponte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nadene Pinnock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Health and Hospital Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vicki Burgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nina Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 thru 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?