In Re: Neelam Taneja
| Neelam Taneja |
| Neelam Taneja |
| Jeffrey L. Sapir |
| 1:2017cv09429 |
| December 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The appellant has not met the heavy burden required to succeed on a motion for reconsideration. The appellant's motion for reconsideration is denied with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the pending motion at Docket Number 34 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. re: 34 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 16 Clerk's Judgment filed by Neelam Taneja. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/19/2019) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 29 MOTION MOTION FOR REHEARING re: 22 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Neelam Taneja. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 29 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/31/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Stay, filed by Neelam Taneja. Because Taneja has not shown that any of the four relevant factors weigh in favor of a stay, Taneja's motion for a stay is denied. Taneja may file a motion for a stay before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 8 (a) (2) (A) (ii). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/23/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Reconsideration, filed by Neelam Taneja. This Court never issued an indicative ruling under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1. On August 29, 2018, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an Order holding the appellant's pending appeal in abeyance until a final ruling on the appellant's motion for reconsideration was issued. Because the appellant did not file any additional materials supporting her appeal of the bankruptcy c ourt's decision, her motion for reconsideration is denied. See Davidson v. Scully, 172 F. Supp. 2d 458, 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) ("A motion for reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions o r data that the court overlooked -- matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the court"). Well after the June 15 deadline, the appellant filed a proposed order that would discharge her debt un der 11 U.S.C. § 727. That proposed order is without basis and does not support her motion for reconsideration. Therefore, the Court declines to sign the proposed order. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/15/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 18 MOTION for Reconsideration. filed by Neelam Taneja. Because the appellant has filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, this Court lacks jurisdiction to modify the March 21, 2018, M emorandum Opinion & Order. See United States v. Rodgers, 101 F.3d 247, 251 (2d Cir. 1996). The appellant is nevertheless invited to file in this Court by June 15, 2018, any additional materials with respect to her appeal from the bankruptcy court� 39;s order. At that point, if the appellant's additional materials render her appeal meritorious, the Court may issue an order requesting that the Court of Appeals remand the matter to this Court so that the Court may modify the judgment. If th e appellant's additional materials do not render her appeal meritorious, the Court may instead deny her motion for reconsideration without waiting for the result of the appeal in the Court of Appeals in the interest of judicial economy and as further set forth in this Opinion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/24/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 14 MOTION to Stay filed by Neelam Taneja, 6 MOTION to Stay filed by Neelam Taneja. Accordingly, the order dismissing Taneja's Chapter 13 petition is affirmed. Taneja also moves for a stay pend ing appeal. Because this Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Taneja's appeal, her motion for a stay is denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/21/2018) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
