Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. v. R&E Diamonds LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. v. R&E Diamonds LLC

Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. v. R&E Diamonds LLC

Plaintiff:	Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd.
Defendant:	R&E Diamonds LLC
Case Number:	1:2017cv09489
Filed:	December 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Alison J. Nathan
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 8, 2019	Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 FIRST MOTION for Default Judgment as to R & E Diamonds LLC. filed by Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. The Court grants Defendant's motion to vacate the default. The Court denies Plaintiffs motion for default judgment without prejudice as moot. Defendant is also ordered to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order. Within 14 days of this order, Defendant will show cause by letter why it should not be required t o pay Plaintiff's fees and costs in filing for the entry of default and filing for default judgment. The parties are ordered to appear before the Court on May 3, 2019, at 3:45 p.m. for an initial pretrial conference. The parties are directed to submit a joint letter and proposed case management plan to the Court seven days before that conference. This resolves Docket Number 28. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 5/3/2019 at 03:45 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/7/2019) (kv)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 8, 2019

Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 FIRST MOTION for Default Judgment as to R & E Diamonds LLC. filed by Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. The Court grants Defendant's motion to vacate the default. The Court denies Plaintiffs motion for default judgment without prejudice as moot. Defendant is also ordered to file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order. Within 14 days of this order, Defendant will show cause by letter why it should not be required t o pay Plaintiff's fees and costs in filing for the entry of default and filing for default judgment. The parties are ordered to appear before the Court on May 3, 2019, at 3:45 p.m. for an initial pretrial conference. The parties are directed to submit a joint letter and proposed case management plan to the Court seven days before that conference. This resolves Docket Number 28. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 5/3/2019 at 03:45 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/7/2019) (kv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd. v. R&E Diamonds LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holzman Fabian Diamonds Ltd.
Represented By:	Joanna Rebecca Cohen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: R&E Diamonds LLC
Represented By:	Michael Roland Curran
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?