Mendizabal v. Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maria Mendizabal
Defendant: Nike, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv09498
Filed: December 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Paul G Gardephe
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2018 Filing 14 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Maria Mendizabal ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Nike, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through Plaintiff's undersigned counsel and Defendant's undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that this action shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 4/4/2018) (cf)
January 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this order, either party may apply by letter within the thirty-day period for restoration of theaction to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Any pending motions are moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 1/29/2018) (ama)
January 26, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement . Document filed by Maria Mendizabal. (Mizrahi, Joseph)
January 23, 2018 Filing 11 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference respectfully requesting a 30-day adjournment of the Initial Conference addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Samuel Sverdlov dated January 23, 2018. Document filed by Nike, Inc..(Sverdlov, Samuel)
December 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The application is granted. Nike, Inc. answer due 2/2/2018. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 12/26/2017) (ap)
December 26, 2017 Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Nike, Inc. served on 12/13/2017, answer due 1/3/2018. Service was accepted by Elena Bou, Legal Clerk. Document filed by Maria Mendizabal. (Mizrahi, Joseph)
December 18, 2017 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Samuel Sverdlov on behalf of Nike, Inc.. (Sverdlov, Samuel)
December 18, 2017 Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #2 Complaint respectfully requesting an additional thirty (30) days to respond addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Samuel Sverdlov dated December 18, 2017. Document filed by Nike, Inc..(Sverdlov, Samuel)
December 5, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 2/1/2018 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 705 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Paul G. Gardephe. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 12/5/2017) (mro)
December 5, 2017 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nike, Inc. (vf)
December 5, 2017 Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (vf)
December 5, 2017 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (vf)
December 5, 2017 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
December 4, 2017 Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph) Modified on 12/5/2017 (vf).
December 4, 2017 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Nike, Inc., re: #2 Complaint. Document filed by Maria Mendizabal. (Mizrahi, Joseph)
December 4, 2017 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Nike, Inc.. Document filed by Maria Mendizabal.(Mizrahi, Joseph)
December 4, 2017 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Mizrahi, Joseph)
December 4, 2017 Civil Case Opening Fee Payment: for #2 Complaint. Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0208-14433625.(Mizrahi, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendizabal v. Nike, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Mendizabal
Represented By: Joseph H Mizrahi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nike, Inc.
Represented By: Samuel Sverdlov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?