Wang v. Yong Lee Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ming En Wang
Defendant: Yong Lee Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe and Jing Yang
Case Number: 1:2017cv09582
Filed: December 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: J. Paul Oetken
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 100 CLERK'S JUDGMENT FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS in favor of Yong Lee Inc., Jane Doe, Jing Yang, John Doe against Ming En Wang in the amount of $134,075.57. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in t he Court's Order dated January 11, 2023, judgment is entered against Defendants in the amount of $134,075.57, reflecting Plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs incurred in this matter. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 1/12/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
January 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER: Per the Order at Docket Number 98, the Clerk of Court is directed to issue a judgment against Defendants in the amount of $134,075.57, reflecting Plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs incurred in this matter. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/11/2023) (ate) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER granting 95 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs is GRANTED to the extent of $128,866.00 in fees and $5,209.57 in costs, for a grand total of $134,075.57. A judgment for fees and costs in that amount shall be issued. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 95. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/19/2022) (ate)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 94 AMENDED JUDGMENT IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: that Plaintiff Ming En Wang (hereinafter "Plaintiff") has judgment jointly and severally against Defendants Yong Lee, Inc. d/b/a Spice Saigon (hereinafter "Yong Lee, Inc." ), and "Jing Yang" (hereinafter collectively "Defendants"), jointly and severally, as follows: in the amount of $155,522.18, consisting of (A) compensatory damages for unpaid wages (minimum wages, overtime, wages, and spread of hour wages) under the New York Labor Law (hereinafter "NYLL") in the amount of $57,253.29; (B) liquidated damages for unpaid wages under the NYLL in the amount of $57,253.29; (C) statutory damages for violation of NYLL § 1 95.1 in the amount of $5,000.00; (D) statutory damages for violation of NYLL § 195.3 in the amount of $5,000.00; and (E) prejudgment interest calculated at the rate of 9% per annum and totaling $31,015.60. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: that Plaintiff be awarded attorney's fees against Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount to be determined following briefing and documentation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: that Plaintiffs be awarded post-judgment interest, as calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. If any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days after expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal is then pending, whichever is l ater, the total amount of judgment shall automatically increase by fifteen percent, as required by NYLL § 198.4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/1/2022) (jca)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 93 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: that Plaintiff Ming En Wang (hereinafter "Plaintiff") has judgment jointly and severally against Defendants Yong Lee, Inc. d/b/a Spice Saigon (hereinafter "Yong Lee, Inc." ;), and "Jing Yang" (hereinafter collectively "Defendants"), jointly and severally, as follows: in the amount of $_______________, consisting of (A) compensatory damages for unpaid wages (minimum wages, overtime, w ages, and spread of hour wages) under the New York Labor Law (hereinafter NYLL) in the amount of $57,253.29; (B) liquidated damages for unpaid wages under the NYLL in the amount of $57,253.29; (C) statutory damages for violation of NYLL § 195.1 in the amount of $5,000.00; (D) statutory damages for violation of NYLL § 195.3 in the amount of $5,000.00; and (E) prejudgment interest calculated at the rate of 9% per annum and totaling $__________ ________. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: that Plaintiffs be awarded post-judgment interest, as calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. If any amounts remain unpaid upon the expiration of ninety days following issuance of judgment, or ninety days aft er expiration of the time to appeal and no appeal is then pending, whichever is later, the total amount of judgment shall automatically increase by fifteen percent, as required by NYLL § 198.4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment, and to close this case. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/24/2022) (ate) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wang v. Yong Lee Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ming En Wang
Represented By: John Troy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yong Lee Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jing Yang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?