Vasile v. Long Island Railroad Company et al
Plaintiff: Damian Vasile
Defendant: Long Island Railroad Company, New York Metropolitan Transit Authority, MTA-Long Island Rail Road and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross_claimant: MTA-Long Island Rail Road, New York Metropolitan Transit Authority, Long Island Railroad Company and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cross_defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Long Island Railroad Company, MTA-Long Island Rail Road and New York Metropolitan Transit Authority
Case Number: 1:2017cv09623
Filed: December 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Katherine B. Forrest
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 220 ORDER: On August 11, 2023, the Court granted the parties' request for a ninth extension until August 24, 2023 to file a stipulation of dismissal for the attention of the Honorable Louis L. Stanton. (ECF No. 219). To date, the parties have not done so. Accordingly, the parties are granted a final extension of time until August 31, 2023 to file the stipulation of dismissal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 8/25/2023) (tg)
July 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 213 ORDER: Pursuant to the Telephone Conference held today, July 5, 2023, the deadline for the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal for the attention of the Honorable Louis L. Stanton is EXTENDED from July 6, 2023 to July 20, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/5/2023) (tg)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 208 ORDER: On June 8, 2023, the Court granted the parties' request for an extension until June 14, 2023 to file a stipulation of dismissal for the attention of the Honorable Louis L. Stanton. (ECF No. 207). To date, the parties have not done so. Accordingly, the parties are granted a final extension of time until June 20, 2023 to file the stipulation of dismissal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 6/15/2023) (tg)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER: On February 10, 2023, the Court directed the parties to file a joint letter regarding the status of their mediation efforts (the "Letter") by April 5, 2023. To date, the parties have not filed the Letter. Accordingly, the parties shall file the Letter by Wednesday, April 12, 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 4/6/2023) (vfr)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 175 ORDER granting 174 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The parties' letter-motion seeking an adjournment of the settlement conference (the "Conference") scheduled for tomorrow, August 17, 2022, at 10:00 am (ECF No. 174) is GRANT ED, and the Conference is ADJOURNED to Thursday, September 29, 2022 at 10:00 am. All other terms of the original scheduling order (ECF No. 173) remain in effect. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 174. Settlement Conference set for 9/29/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 8/16/2022) (ate)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER: The Daubert motions prop osed by the parties in communications made to the Court on March 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, Dkt. Nos. 149-150, are respectfully referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave. The parties' proposed motions for summary judgment are deferred until after the determination of the Daubert motions. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/5/2022) (rro)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER. The Court orders as follows: 1. Yesterday, March 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to preclude expert testimony under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c). (ECF No. 133 (the "Motion")). However, S.D.N.Y. Local Civil Rule 37.2 req uires that a party filing a motion under Rules 26 through 37 must first "request[] an informal conference with the Court by letter-motion for a pre-motion discovery conference[.]" Accordingly, Plaintiff must file a pre-motion conference letter in support of the Motion, to which Defendants shall respond. 2. In accordance with the Individual Practices of the Honorable Louis L. Stanton, the parties shall file a pre-motion conference letter in advance of any dispositive or Daubert motion(s). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 3/3/22) (yv)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER granting 129 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The Settlement Conference scheduled for November 19, 2021 is ADJOURNED to Friday, January 7, 2022 at 10:00 am, hosted by the Court through the Microsoft Teams platform. The terms of the Set tlement Conference Scheduling Order (ECF No. 126) are incorporated by reference. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF no. 129. SO ORDERED. ( Settlement Conference set for 1/7/2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 11/5/21) (yv)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER: Pursuant to the Telephone Status Conference held today, September 14, 2021, the Court orders as follows: 1. The parties shall promptly confer concerning their availability and willingness to participate in a Settlement Conference in Nove mber 2021. By Tuesday, September 21, 2021, the parties shall email Chambers (at Cave_NYSDchambers@NYSD.uscourts.gov) concerning the scheduling, and format, of an upcoming Settlement Conference. 2. The deadline for the completion of expert d epositions remains September 30, 2021 (ECF No. 123), except the Court will permit the deposition of Dr. Beth Greenbaum to go forward on October 13, 2021. By Friday, October 15, 2021, the parties shall file a discovery status report confirming that all depositions have been completed and setting forth the proposed next steps to move this action forward. SO ORDERED. ( Deposition due by 10/13/2021.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 9/14/2021) (vfr)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER, The Court orders as follows: 1. The parties shall provide their joint status report concerning their progress with expert depositions ("Joint Status Report") by June 17, 2021. (ECF No. 122). The parties shall include in the Joint Status Report the scheduled dates for the depositions of all experts who will be deposed. 2. The deadline for the completion of all expert depositions is Thursday, September 30, 2021. This deadline is unlikely to be extended. The parties shall sub mit a joint status report by Friday, October 1, 2021, confirming the completion of expert depositions. A Telephone Discovery Conference is scheduled for Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 2:00 pm on the Court's conference line. The parties are dir ected to call: (866) 390-1828; access code: 380-9799, at the scheduled time. SO ORDERED. ( Deposition due by 9/30/2021., Telephone Conference set for 9/14/2021 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 5/26/21) (yv)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER granting 101 Letter Motion for Discovery. The parties' joint Letter-Motion (ECF No. 101) is GRANTED. Fact discovery closes Monday, November 2, 2020. Plaintiff's expert disclosures are due by Tuesday, December 8, 2020. Defendants& #039; expert disclosures are due by Monday, February 1, 2021. The parties' dispositive motions deadline is extended to Thursday, April 15, 2021. The parties' joint pretrial order is due by Monday, May 17, 2021. The parties should not expe ct to be afforded any additional extensions. A Telephone Conference is scheduled for Monday, October 26, 2020, at 3:00 pm, regarding the status of discovery. The parties' Settlement Conference is adjourned to Tuesday, November 24, 2020, at 2:0 0 pm, with settlement submissions due by Wednesday, November 18, 2020. For both conferences, parties are directed to call the Court's conference line at the scheduled time: 866-390-1828, access code 3809799. All parties who intend to speak during the call must use a landline or phone with equivalent quality. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 101. SO-ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 9/23/20) (yv)
July 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 94 AMENDED CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/14/20) (yv)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 88 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L Cave on 7/2/20) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasile v. Long Island Railroad Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damian Vasile
Represented By: Seth Joseph Feinstein
Represented By: Craig P. Fenno
Represented By: Robert Lev Isabella
Represented By: Jacob Ely Lewin
Represented By: Lawrence W. Rosenblatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Long Island Railroad Company
Represented By: William J. Blumenschein
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Metropolitan Transit Authority
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MTA-Long Island Rail Road
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Scott H. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: MTA-Long Island Rail Road
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: New York Metropolitan Transit Authority
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: Long Island Railroad Company
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Scott H. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Represented By: Scott H. Goldstein
Represented By: Scott H. Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: Long Island Railroad Company
Represented By: William J. Blumenschein
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: MTA-Long Island Rail Road
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: New York Metropolitan Transit Authority
Represented By: Paul Agustin Krez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?