Zepporak Reign v. United States of America, Inc. et al
| Heiress Kenyatta T. Zepporak Reign |
| United States of America, Inc., Federal Land Aquisition Corp., (SEC) Security Exchange Commission and The Social Security Act Asamended Section 205(a) of (42 U.S.C.405ca) Title |
| 1:2017cv09648 |
| December 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration re; 5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint) filed by Heiress Kenyatta T. Zepporak Reign. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF 6) is denied. This action is closed. The Clerk of Court will only accept for filing documents that are directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. If Plaintiff files other documents that are frivolous or meritless, the Court will direct Plaintiff to show cause why Plaintiff should no t be barred from filing further documents in this action. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/27/2022) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (vfr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
