Gonzalez-Alvarez v. Eckert

Gonzalez-Alvarez v. Eckert

Petitioner:	Jonathan Gonzalez-Alvarez
Respondent:	Stewart Eckert
Case Number:	1:2017cv09773
Filed:	December 12, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge:	Andrew L. Carter
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 17, 2023	Filing 27 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Stewart Eckert against Jonathan Gonzalez-Alvarez. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 17, 2023, Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice and the R&R is adopted in full. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certi ficate of appealability, see 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2); Lucidore v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir. 2000), and the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/17/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 17, 2023

Filing 27 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations in favor of Stewart Eckert against Jonathan Gonzalez-Alvarez. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 17, 2023, Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice and the R&R is adopted in full. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certi ficate of appealability, see 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2); Lucidore v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir. 2000), and the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith. Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 5/17/2023) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (km)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez-Alvarez v. Eckert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan Gonzalez-Alvarez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Stewart Eckert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?