Boves v. Aaron's, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Osvaldo Boves
Defendant: Aaron's, Inc. and David Epright
Case Number: 1:2018cv00005
Filed: January 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Henry B. Pitman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 OPINION AND ORDER re: 79 LETTER MOTION to Compel Plaintiff Boves to arbitrate addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman from Joseph M. English dated 02/20/2019. filed by Aaron's, Inc., David Epright, 66 LETTER MOT ION to Reopen /Reconsider Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration [Dkt 27] addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman from Joseph M. English dated August 16, 2018. filed by Aaron's, Inc., David Epright, 69 MOTION to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration, and Brief in Support filed by Aaron's, Inc. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to compel arbitration is granted. The case is stayed pending the conclusion of the arb itration proceeding. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close the case on the active docket of the Court subject to reinstatement depending on any developments in the arbitration. The Clerk of the Court is also respectfully requested to mark Docket Items 66, 69 and 79 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/14/2019) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ne) Modified on 3/14/2019 (ne).
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER re: 40 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Deny. filed by Aaron's, Inc., David Epright, 27 MOTION to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration, and Brie f in Support. filed by Aaron's, Inc., David Epright, 36 MOTION deny arbitration as a matter of law or permit a jury trial under FAA § 4 re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration, and Brief in Support. . filed by Osvaldo Boves. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion to compel arbitration is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mark Docket Items 27, 36 and 40 closed. This matter is stayed pending the outcome of the parties' arbitration. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/19/2018) (ne) Modified on 7/19/2018 (ne).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boves v. Aaron's, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Osvaldo Boves
Represented By: Gregory S. Antollino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron's, Inc.
Represented By: Ilene Weisbard Berman
Represented By: Joseph English
Represented By: Shawntel Hebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Epright
Represented By: Ilene Weisbard Berman
Represented By: Joseph English
Represented By: Shawntel Hebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?