Osuan v. New York City Department of Buildings et al
| Nekpen Osuan |
| The City of New York |
| 1:2018cv00151 |
| January 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| William H. Pauley |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER... This action is discontinued without costs to any party, and without prejudice to reopening this action if such an application is made within thirty (30) days of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and mark this case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 7/7/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 73 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Based on the above, the settlement conference scheduled previously for February 13, 2020, is cancelled. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 2/12/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 69 Motion to Adjourn Conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement conference scheduled previously in the above-captioned action for December 10, 2019, shall be held on February 13, 2020, at 2:30 p.m., in courtroom 228, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 12/9/2019) Settlement Conference set for 2/13/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 228, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. (ks)
|
|
Filing
66
STIPULATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 11/20/2019) (mro)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION & ORDER re: 44 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion is granted in part and denied in part. Osuan's federal and city discrimination claims, as well as her Monell claims against the City and th e individual defendants in their official capacities, are dismissed with prejudice. Defendants' motion to dismiss the federal and NYCHRL retaliation claims is denied. The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on July 9, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 44. (Status Conference set for 7/9/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge William H. Pauley III.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 6/20/2019) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osuan v. New York City Department of Buildings et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nekpen Osuan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The City of New York | |
| Represented By: | John Paul Guyette |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
